Development is now a dirty word.
Some statistics to start:
The decade-long average shows new dwelling starts at around 14,000 per month. At present across Australia it is just 11,000 per month – a 20% fall. New house sales are down about 15% from long-term averages; a similar trend can be seen in the new apartment market, too.
This snapshot illustrates a more alarming trend – nationally there were 180,000 new dwellings built in 2003-04; this financial year it will be under 130,000. New house sales peaked in 2002-03 with 113,500 transactions; this year just 78,000 new homes sold. There were– according to the HIA-JELD-WEN Australia New Home Sales report – 38,500 new apartment sales in 2001-02, but today the HIA reports just 9,000 new unit sales.
In Queensland, 29,000 new dwellings were built in 2003-04, with just 17,500 built over the last 12 months. Despite the recent building boost, just 950 new houses were sold across Queensland during April – the first time new sales dropped below 1,000 over the last decade or so.
Admittedly, the data on new home and apartment sales is from a survey, rather than a complete snapshot of activity, but it does provide a somewhat accurate picture of what is (well, isn’t really) going on in the new residential market across much of Australia.
So what gives? Our recent Matusik Pulse poll asked our subscribers and twits (Twitter followers, for the digitally challenged) this question, “What is stopping new residential sales at present?”
Limited development finance and low valuations came in as the clear winner, with just over a third of your votes. Yes, developers are finding it harder to get finance at present (they have since late 2008) and many lenders require an 80% pre-commitment or above before they are willing to assist with finance. Wave bye-bye to most new medium- and especially high-rise apartment developments.
Higher taxes and charges on development came in second with about 20% of the vote. On the Gold Coast, for example, taxes and charges make up 40% of the price of a new house-and-land package. What this means to the average family is about $170,000 in extra interest over the life of a 25-year loan. And somehow, there isn’t marching in the streets. The cost of electricity rises and we see a cascade of letters to the editor, TV cameras taking still shots of utility bills and families crying about not being able to run the air-con. But we hear nothing about how government is sticking it to the housing sector, and more importantly, to buyers. This is about our sons and daughters, people, not some overseas buyer or interstate investor.
The world economy is also taking its toll on demand – really, at the heart of this is a lack of confidence, and this is seen in our survey via job insecurity (14%) and a genuine lack of demand (13%). A large component behind this limited demand has to do with slower population growth and increasing household size.
Poorer potential for capital growth makes up about 10% of the reasoning for the slowdown in sales, with one in 12 saying that developers are not meeting the market.
The usual chestnut – interest rates being too high – barely got a rating in our survey, attracting less than 4% of the vote.
If we don’t somehow boost home building, then many sectors of the Australian economy are left without much momentum. Home building – as Craig James from CommSec often, and so rightly points out – affects not only builders and tradespeople, but also financiers, retailers, landscapers, building material companies, solicitors, accountants, agents, building service professionals and even independent property consultants!
Read more here http://www.propertyobserver.com.au/developments/we-must-get-residential-development-back-on-the-front-page-michael-matusik/2012052954891?utm_source=Property+Observer+List&utm_campaign=7283bf06e6-May_30_20124_10_2012&utm_medium=email